Method
What is actually being calculated
Most of what this product says comes out of geometry rather than out of a table of opinions. Here is the chain, and here is where each link stops being reliable.
The chain, in one picture
Evidence in, verdict out — and where it can refuse to answer
Evidence
- What you drew. Walls, fences, canopy, the seat and where it faces
- Where and when. Latitude, timezone, the hour, the day of the year
- Climate. Normals for the place, or nothing, said plainly
- What you told us. Observations, measurements, corrections
One scene, put through the sun
- Sun position. NOAA, in real local time
- Light arriving. Clear sky, then cloud, then the beam and diffuse split
- Your obstructions. A ray traced to the sun through real geometry
- Sky visible. Cosine-weighted hemisphere sampling
Then
That produces seven independent readings — direct sun, felt heat, glare, wind, wetness, privacy, night — each carrying its own workings and its own drivers. The use you picked turns readings into limits, because dinner needs different things from a nap or a nursery bed. The limits produce a verdict, a confidence, the controlling failure and what would change it.
A heavy unknown anywhere above does not get averaged over. It travels down the chain and makes the verdict unanswerable, which is a different thing from a low score.
Where the sun is
Solar position is computed from the NOAA algorithm in UTC, and local clock times are resolved through the property's actual timezone rather than a stored offset. That second part matters more than it sounds: a fixed offset is an hour wrong for half the year, and an hour moves every shade answer with it.
Where it stops: Positional astronomy is the easy part. It says nothing about how much energy arrives.
How much light arrives
Clear-sky beam and diffuse irradiance come from the ASHRAE model with air mass after Kasten and Young. Cloud is applied with the Kasten and Czeplak global relation, and the beam and diffuse split is recovered with the Erbs correlation, which correctly collapses the beam far faster than the diffuse under heavy cloud.
Where it stops: Site-specific optical depths come from published station tables. Where a site has none, a seasonal approximation is substituted and the interface says so.
What your property does to it
Every obstruction is a real object with a footprint, an underside, a top and an opacity. A ray is traced from the point to the sun and the transmittance along it is the answer. Tree canopies are modelled as crowns with a leaf-on and leaf-off state, and louvres block according to the angle the light arrives at, which is why a pergola and an awning are different decisions.
Where it stops: Everything is modelled as vertical prisms and ellipsoids. A complicated roof is an approximation.
How much sky it can see
The hemisphere is sampled so that every sample carries the same cosine-weighted share of sky. The mean transmittance over those samples is the sky view factor, and it reduces to the familiar horizon-elevation formula when things block from the ground up. It drives diffuse light, night cooling and how sheltered from rain a spot is.
Where it stops: An isotropic sky. Real skies are brighter near the sun and near the horizon.
What it feels like
Shortwave and longwave fluxes at a person are integrated over six directions to give a mean radiant temperature, following the standard outdoor method. That, air temperature and wind at seat height give an operative temperature after ASHRAE 55, and humidity or wind chill is applied at the ends where each matters. Every driver is found by ablation: remove the influence, recompute, report the difference. The explanation and the number therefore cannot drift apart.
Where it stops: Screening grade. It is good enough to say a seat runs ten degrees above shaded air at half past four. It is not a thermal comfort study.
Who can see whom
A sightline is a ray from an eye to an eye, traced against the same scene. The height a barrier needs at any position is solved from the geometry, and the width it needs comes from the angle the target zone occupies as seen from the observer. That is why a screen near you is short and wide, and one near them is tall and narrow.
Where it stops: It assumes people are where you put them. Two metres of seat position changes a sightline more than most things you could measure.
How long things stay wet
Evaporation is the Penman combination equation, run hour by hour on the radiation and air that actually reach that surface, with a mass-transfer allowance for fabric and foam which expose far more surface to moving air than a puddle does. That is what turns 'it rains a lot here' into 'the cushions are dry by ten in June and never in November'.
Where it stops: Derived for open water and short grass. The fabric allowance is an explicit multiplier, not something the equation covers.
What we do not know
Anything the product cannot answer says so instead of substituting an average. Where something is uncertain, the plausible range is put through the whole model and the spread in the answer decides whether it is worth going outside to measure. A fence height that changes nothing is not worth a tape measure.
Where it stops: It can only be uncertain about things somebody has told it exist.
The reference layer
Anything the product asserts that did not come out of the geometry is carried in a reference layer with the source behind it and the point at which it stops being reliable. Evidence verification and human signoff are tracked separately: checking an authoritative publisher or peer-reviewed record can clear an evidence warning, but it can never pretend that a person read a paywalled standard when they did not.
31 source records currently carry an explicit publisher, peer-reviewed or reference audit. Human signoff remains a separate stronger state and is never inferred from this automated evidence pass.
Every number this thing decides on
The claim is that nothing here is a tuned weight you cannot see. That is only true if the constants are somewhere you can read them with the reason beside them, so here they are: the bound, where it fires, and why it is that number rather than one nearby. Where a published source describes the phenomenon but does not define Exposure Atlas’s exact cut point, the rationale now says that explicitly.
| Rule | Bound | Where |
|---|---|---|
| A moment counts as being in direct sun once at least half the beam reaches the point. Dappled light under a canopy has a transmittance that wanders either side of a half all day. Anything lower and a bed under a tree reports full sun; anything higher and a spot that is visibly sunlit through a pergola reports shade. | at least 0.5 fraction of beam | sun/day |
| Global solar energy converts to photosynthetic photon flux at 2.02 micromoles per joule. The conversion for broadband daylight. It shifts a few per cent between clear and overcast skies and under a canopy, which is well inside the uncertainty the daily light integral already carries. | 2.02 µmol/J | sun/day |
| Under a clear sky, ultraviolet is 4.5 per cent of the global solar energy reaching the ground. A deterministic atmospheric approximation used by the daily UV channel. Published observations show that the UV-to-shortwave ratio varies with cloud, ozone, aerosol and water vapour, so 4.5% is a central modelling value rather than a universal measured constant. | 0.045 fraction of global | sun/day |
| The ultraviolet share rises by 3.5 percentage points as the sky goes from clear to fully scattered. A deterministic approximation that lets UV retain a larger share of total shortwave as radiation becomes more diffuse. Research supports the direction and non-linearity of the cloud effect, but not a universal +3.5 percentage-point coefficient. | 0.035 fraction of global | sun/day |
| A quarter of the days in a month are treated as genuinely half-covered; the rest are near-clear or near-solid. Observed daily cloud cover is U-shaped: skies are usually nearly clear or nearly solid and rarely half. This share is what lets a three-state decomposition carry the curvature of a convex attenuation curve that must not be evaluated at the mean. | 0.25 share of days | sun/irradiance |
| A surface hour counts as punishing once the surface passes forty-five degrees. Skin blanches at around fifty degrees and burns not far above it. The threshold sits below the injury point rather than at it, because the reading is meant to warn before the burn rather than record it. | above 45 C | exposure/daily |
| Below nineteen degrees operative, humidity is not what decides whether a place works. A product handover point: below this, the humidity correction is deliberately suppressed so a cool damp evening is not made warmer by a branch intended for warm conditions. BOM apparent-temperature guidance supports the variables; it does not prescribe this 19°C threshold. | above 19 C | exposure/thermal |
| The heat index begins taking over from Steadman's apparent temperature at twenty-six degrees. A product blending boundary between the lower-temperature apparent-temperature branch and the NWS heat-index branch. NWS documents the heat-index equation and its warm-condition use; neither NWS nor BOM specifies Exposure Atlas's cross-fade interval. | above 26 C | exposure/thermal |
| Above twenty-nine degrees, the heat index alone reports the felt temperature. Comfortably inside the regression's valid range, and the figure people recognise from a forecast. | above 29 C | exposure/thermal |
| A clothed person absorbs seventy per cent of the shortwave radiation falling on them. The standard value for average clothing. It is genuinely a property of what somebody is wearing, which the product cannot know, and it is one of the larger uncertainties in the felt temperature. | 0.7 fraction | exposure/thermal |
| A person radiates as a near-black body at 0.97 emissivity. Skin and clothing are both close to black in the longwave. This one is not controversial. | 0.97 emissivity | exposure/thermal |
| Where no surface is mapped, the ground is assumed to reflect a fifth of the light falling on it. Roughly grass or mid-tone paving. It is a default rather than a measurement, and mapping the actual surface moves the answer, which is why the interface asks. | 0.2 albedo | exposure/derive |
| Where no wall finish is known, nearby walls are assumed to reflect just over a third. Between render and brick. A pale rendered wall is nearly double this and is the single most common reason a courtyard runs hotter than the model says. | 0.35 albedo | exposure/derive |
| The daily temperature peak lags solar noon by up to one hour and forty-eight minutes. The lag between peak radiation and peak air temperature. It is why an afternoon terrace is hottest well after the sun has begun to drop, and why a verdict at solar noon is the wrong reading to take. | at most 1.8 h | climate/diurnal |
| After sunset the air cools on an exponential decay with a shape constant of 2.2. Fitted by Parton and Logan against observed night-time profiles. It decides how much of the evening a terrace keeps, which is most of what the after-dark readings are about. | 2.2 decay constant | climate/diurnal |
| A windbreak that is about forty per cent open shelters further than a solid one. A solid barrier throws air over the top and drops it in a turbulent wake a few heights downwind. A porous one bleeds air through and lengthens the sheltered zone considerably. It is the most counter-intuitive number in the model, which is exactly why it is declared rather than buried. | 0.4 fraction open | exposure/wind |
| No single barrier is credited with removing more than three quarters of the wind. Field measurements downwind of shelterbelts rarely show more, and a model that lets a fence take ninety per cent of the wind will happily recommend one where it cannot work. | at most 0.75 fraction removed | exposure/wind |
| A suburban site is modelled with an aerodynamic roughness length of 0.4 metres. The standard land-use class for houses and gardens, and the default. It is what turns a ten-metre reference wind into the wind at a seated person, and getting the class wrong moves that by more than most interventions do. | 0.4 m | exposure/wind |
| Open country is modelled with an aerodynamic roughness length of 0.03 metres. The class for an exposed rural site, where the same reference wind arrives far stronger at the ground. | 0.03 m | exposure/wind |
| A dense urban site is modelled with an aerodynamic roughness length of 2 metres. It makes the ground-level wind low and the model must not be trusted too far here: dense city air is dominated by channelling and downwash between buildings, which a roughness length cannot express. | 2 m | exposure/wind |
| The sky is sampled in thirty-six directions around the horizon. Ten degrees apart. Coarser and a narrow gap between two buildings is missed entirely; finer costs time for a change well inside the uncertainty of the geometry it is tracing. | 36 directions | geom/sky |
| The sky is sampled in twelve rings of equal solid-angle contribution. The rings are spaced so that sine squared of the altitude is uniform, which makes every sample carry the same cosine-weighted share of the hemisphere. Uniform angular spacing would over-weight the horizon, where obstructions are, and quietly understate the sky. | 12 rings | geom/sky |
| Anything the property record holds at below 0.65 confidence is worth going and measuring. The line between a figure that is good enough to answer with and one where the honest next step is a tape measure. It decides what the product asks the owner to go and find out, which is the one place it spends their time. | below 0.65 confidence | reasoning/infogain |
| A hardiness zone is a ten-degree Fahrenheit band of extreme winter minimum, starting at minus sixty for zone one. The USDA definition. It is carried so the product can convert a stated extreme minimum into the zone people actually shop by, and so it can say that hardiness only decides survival and never decides performance. | 10 F | carrier/plant-fit |
| The growing season is taken as the 183 days from April to September. A northern-hemisphere convention, and a known limitation: it is wrong by half a year in the southern hemisphere and wrong in kind in the tropics, where there is no season to average over. | 183 days | exposure/daily |
| Each month is represented by the fifteenth, and its readings multiplied by 30.4 days. Twelve traced days rather than three hundred and sixty-five. The mid-month day is close to the month's mean declination, so the error is small and the saving is two orders of magnitude. | 30.4 days/month | exposure/daily |
| Below four moles a day is called deep shade. Beneath this, very little does more than persist. It is the level at which the honest advice is to change the geometry rather than the plant. | below 4 mol/m2/day | exposure/daily |
| Four to ten moles a day is called shade. The range where shade-adapted planting thrives and everything else merely survives. | below 10 mol/m2/day | exposure/daily |
| Ten to eighteen moles a day is called part shade. Enough for most foliage and for leafy crops, short of what fruiting crops need. | below 18 mol/m2/day | exposure/daily |
| Eighteen to twenty-eight moles a day is called part sun. The band where a tomato starts to be worth attempting. | below 28 mol/m2/day | exposure/daily |
| Above 1.1 megajoules a square metre a day, ultraviolet exposure is called harsh. An Exposure Atlas material-risk band chosen so high cumulative UV cannot pass as benign. ASTM outdoor/xenon weathering practices establish that UV exposure matters to material durability, while atmospheric-radiation studies show that site UV varies; no cited standard defines 1.1 MJ/m²/day as a universal harsh threshold. | above 1.1 MJ/m2/day | exposure/daily |
| Above 0.6 megajoules a square metre a day, ultraviolet exposure stops being gentle. An Exposure Atlas screening boundary between low and material UV pressure, not an ASTM classification. Outdoor-weathering and atmospheric-radiation sources support the phenomenon; local material response remains product-specific. | above 0.6 MJ/m2/day | exposure/daily |
| A surface that dries within three hours is called quick-drying. A product usability band: three hours is short enough that a shower before lunch need not decide the afternoon. Penman and FAO-56 support the evaporation relationships behind drying capacity; neither source defines this patio-use threshold. | at most 3 h | exposure/daily |
| A surface taking more than seven hours to dry is called slow. A product usability band: beyond seven hours, wetness commonly occupies most of the usable day. Evaporation literature supports the drying physics and UKSRG guidance supports treating wet/contaminated surface condition as relevant to slip; neither defines seven hours as a standard limit. | above 7 h | exposure/daily |
| More than four hours a day above the surface heat threshold is called punishing. Long enough that there is no time of day when the surface is usable barefoot, rather than merely a hot hour to avoid. | above 4 h | exposure/daily |
| A surface peaking above fifty-two degrees is called too hot to touch. Above the point at which contact causes injury rather than discomfort. | above 52 C | exposure/daily |
| A surface peaking above forty-two degrees is called hot underfoot. Where a dog will not lie down and a person in shoes still notices. | above 42 C | exposure/daily |
| More than fifty-five freeze-thaw cycles a year is called severe. The range in which unrated paving, terracotta and unsealed masonry fail within a few winters rather than a few decades. | above 55 cycles/year | exposure/daily |
| More than twenty freeze-thaw cycles a year is enough to matter. The point at which frost rating stops being an upsell and starts being the specification. | above 20 cycles/year | exposure/daily |
| A place that never dries within the day for more than four months of the year is called wet and slow to dry. A product seasonality band: more than four persistently slow-drying months means wet exposure is a recurring design condition rather than an occasional event. EN 335 supports classifying wood service exposure by wetting regime but does not define this four-month cut point. | above 4 months | exposure/daily |
| Up to twenty-six degrees apparent is called comfortable. An Exposure Atlas outdoor-use label, not an ISO 7730 comfort limit. ASHRAE 55 and ISO 7730 provide moderate indoor thermal-comfort context; the app deliberately uses wider, activity-oriented outdoor bands. | at most 26 C | exposure/thermal |
| Up to thirty-two degrees apparent is called warm rather than hot. An Exposure Atlas outdoor-use label. UTCI confirms that outdoor thermal stress depends on temperature, wind, humidity and radiation, but the app does not implement UTCI and 32°C here is not a UTCI category boundary. | at most 32 C | exposure/thermal |
| Above thirty-nine degrees apparent is called severe heat. An Exposure Atlas escalation boundary used to separate a comfort problem from potentially hazardous heat. NWS heat-index and UTCI literature provide heat-stress context; 39°C here is not represented as an official UTCI or NWS category threshold. | above 39 C | exposure/thermal |
| Below sixteen degrees apparent is called cool. Where a seated person stops being comfortable in what they walked outside wearing. | below 16 C | exposure/thermal |
| Below eight degrees apparent is called cold. Below this, sitting outside is a decision about clothing and heat rather than about the place. | below 8 C | exposure/thermal |
| Six hours of direct sun or more on a midsummer day is called full sun. The figure printed on plant labels. It is kept here so the product can say the label's own number back and then say what the light actually adds up to, which is the more useful answer. | at least 6 h | exposure/daily |
| Three hours of direct sun is the boundary between part sun and shade. The other figure on the label, kept for the same reason. | at least 3 h | exposure/daily |
| For dinner outside, felt must be at most 28C. Nobody finishes a meal in a seat that is cooking. | at most 28 C | reasoning/intents |
| For dinner outside, glare must be at most 28 on the reporting scale. You cannot look at the person across the table with the sun behind their head. | at most 28 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For dinner outside, wind must be at most 4m/s. Wind takes napkins, candles and conversation before it takes comfort. | at most 4 m/s | reasoning/intents |
| For dinner outside, wetness must be at most 45 on the reporting scale. A damp seat ends dinner faster than a cold one. | at most 45 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For dinner outside, privacy must be at most 45 on the reporting scale. Being watched while you eat is a real reason people stop using a terrace. | at most 45 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For dinner outside, view must be at least 40 on the reporting scale. Half the point of eating out here is what you are looking at. | at least 40 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For dinner outside, noise must be at most 65 on the reporting scale. Conversation has to survive it. | at most 65 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For morning coffee, felt must be at most 27C. Early sun is usually the point, not the problem. | at most 27 C | reasoning/intents |
| For morning coffee, glare must be at most 45 on the reporting scale. Low morning sun is welcome until it is in your eyes. | at most 45 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For morning coffee, wind must be at most 3.5m/s. Cold air moving early is what sends people back inside. | at most 3.5 m/s | reasoning/intents |
| For morning coffee, wetness must be at most 40 on the reporting scale. Dew is the actual reason the morning chair is unusable, not temperature. | at most 40 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For morning coffee, privacy must be at most 55 on the reporting scale. Early is when people are least dressed for an audience. | at most 55 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For reading for an hour, felt must be at most 26C. An hour is long enough for a few degrees to matter. | at most 26 C | reasoning/intents |
| For reading for an hour, glare must be at most 18 on the reporting scale. Glare on a page is the whole problem; heat is secondary. | at most 18 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For reading for an hour, wind must be at most 3m/s. Wind turns pages you did not ask it to. | at most 3 m/s | reasoning/intents |
| For reading for an hour, privacy must be at most 45 on the reporting scale. Settling in takes not feeling observed. | at most 45 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For reading for an hour, noise must be at most 50 on the reporting scale. Reading is the use most sensitive to intermittent noise. | at most 50 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For having people over, felt must be at most 30C. People generate their own warmth and move to where it works. | at most 30 C | reasoning/intents |
| For having people over, glare must be at most 40 on the reporting scale. Guests can turn their chairs; a host should still know where the sun lands. | at most 40 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For having people over, wind must be at most 5m/s. Wind is the thing that quietly ends an outdoor party. | at most 5 m/s | reasoning/intents |
| For having people over, privacy must be at most 65 on the reporting scale. A crowd cares less about being seen than one person does. | at most 65 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For having people over, nightLight must be at most 60 on the reporting scale. After dark the lighting decides whether people stay outside or drift in. | at most 60 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For sitting out after dark, felt must be at most 27C. Radiant heat held by paving is what makes an evening terrace work at all. | at most 27 C | reasoning/intents |
| For sitting out after dark, nightLight must be at most 45 on the reporting scale. Being the brightest thing in the garden is the same as being on stage. | at most 45 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For sitting out after dark, privacy must be at most 50 on the reporting scale. Daytime privacy and night privacy are different problems in the same place. | at most 50 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For sitting out after dark, wind must be at most 3.5m/s. Evening air movement is felt more sharply than the same wind at noon. | at most 3.5 m/s | reasoning/intents |
| For working outside, felt must be at most 27C. Two hours in the sun with a laptop is not work, it is endurance. | at most 27 C | reasoning/intents |
| For working outside, glare must be at most 14 on the reporting scale. A screen is unreadable long before a page is. | at most 14 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For working outside, directSun must be at most 55 on the reporting scale. Direct sun on a screen defeats every brightness setting there is. | at most 55 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For working outside, wind must be at most 4m/s. Paper moves; so does a light laptop. | at most 4 m/s | reasoning/intents |
| For working outside, noise must be at most 55 on the reporting scale. Calls are the first thing an outdoor desk loses. | at most 55 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For children playing, felt must be at most 28C. Children overheat faster than the adults watching them. | at most 28 C | reasoning/intents |
| For children playing, surfaceHeat must be at most 45C. Bare feet meet the paving long before anybody checks a thermometer. | at most 45 C | reasoning/intents |
| For children playing, directSun must be at most 70 on the reporting scale. Some shade to retreat into matters more than shade everywhere. | at most 70 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For children playing, wetness must be at most 55 on the reporting scale. Wet ground decides what they can do out there. | at most 55 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For the dog, surfaceHeat must be at most 42C. Paw pads burn on surfaces people walk over in shoes without noticing. | at most 42 C | reasoning/intents |
| For the dog, directSun must be at most 60 on the reporting scale. A dog needs somewhere to move to, not a uniformly shaded yard. | at most 60 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For the dog, felt must be at most 26C. Dogs shed heat far less efficiently than we do. | at most 26 C | reasoning/intents |
| For growing things, light must be at least 6 mol/m2/day. Plants respond to the light that actually arrives over a day, not to the label on the tag. Below about six moles a day, very little thrives rather than merely surviving. | at least 6 mol/m2/day | reasoning/intents |
| For growing things, sunHours must be at least 1.5h. Some direct sun, even briefly, changes what is possible here. | at least 1.5 h | reasoning/intents |
| For growing things, dryingTime must be at most 10h. Roots and foliage sitting wet kill more plants than the wrong hardiness zone does. | at most 10 h | reasoning/intents |
| For growing things, heatHours must be at most 5h. Reflected heat off a wall or paving cooks a container from the outside in. | at most 5 h | reasoning/intents |
| For leaving things out, uvDose must be at most 1.1 MJ/m2/day. Ultraviolet dose is cumulative and does not care whether anyone is sitting there. | at most 1.1 MJ/m2/day | reasoning/intents |
| For leaving things out, dryingTime must be at most 12h. Repeated wetting with slow drying is what actually destroys outdoor things, far more than rainfall totals. | at most 12 h | reasoning/intents |
| For leaving things out, heatHours must be at most 5h. Heat cycling opens joints, lifts finishes and warps boards. | at most 5 h | reasoning/intents |
| For leaving things out, freezeThaw must be at most 70 cycles/year. Water getting into something and then freezing is what cracks pots, lifts pavers and splits timber. | at most 70 cycles/year | reasoning/intents |
| For crossing barefoot, surfaceHeat must be at most 49C. This is the one use where the ground decides everything and the air decides nothing. Skin blanches at about fifty degrees and burns not far above it, and a pale-looking paver in July sails past both. | at most 49 C | reasoning/intents |
| For crossing barefoot, directSun must be at most 85 on the reporting scale. Sun on the crossing is only a problem because of what it has done to the slab for the last four hours. | at most 85 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For crossing barefoot, wetness must be at most 70 on the reporting scale. Wet stone is cooler and more slippery at once, which is a trade rather than a fix. | at most 70 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For the hot tub after dark, wind must be at most 2.5m/s. Wet skin above the waterline loses heat by evaporation many times faster than dry skin, so air movement that nobody would notice in a chair is the whole complaint here. | at most 2.5 m/s | reasoning/intents |
| For the hot tub after dark, privacy must be at most 30 on the reporting scale. People are least clothed and most lit at the same moment, which is why this fails on sightline far more often than on temperature. | at most 30 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For the hot tub after dark, nightLight must be at most 35 on the reporting scale. Any lamp near the water makes the tub the brightest object in the garden and everything beyond it invisible. | at most 35 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For the hot tub after dark, felt must be at most 24C. The water handles the body; the air only has to be survivable between the house and the tub. | at most 24 C | reasoning/intents |
| For getting across safely, wetness must be at most 35 on the reporting scale. Wet paving in permanent shade is the failure here, and it is a different failure from wet paving that dries by nine. A surface that never dries grows the film that actually causes the fall. | at most 35 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For getting across safely, nightLight must be at least 25 on the reporting scale. The route has to be lit where the footing changes, not lit generally. Until exterior lights are on the plan this stays unanswered rather than assumed fine. | at least 25 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For getting across safely, glare must be at most 35 on the reporting scale. Low sun straight down a path removes the shadows that tell you where the edge is, which is why the same route is fine at noon and treacherous at six. | at most 35 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For getting across safely, surfaceHeat must be at most 52C. Anyone who moves slowly across it is on it for longer than anyone who does not. | at most 52 C | reasoning/intents |
| For sleeping out, nightLight must be at most 18 on the reporting scale. One security floodlight or one neighbour's window is the whole answer. This is the use with the least tolerance for stray light of anything the product models. | at most 18 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For sleeping out, felt must be at most 24C. Eight motionless hours forgive nothing. A seat that is pleasant for dinner at nineteen degrees is cold by three in the morning. | at most 24 C | reasoning/intents |
| For sleeping out, wetness must be at most 30 on the reporting scale. Dew, not rain, is what soaks bedding on a clear night — and a spot with a wide open sky gets the most of it, which is the opposite of what people expect. | at most 30 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For sleeping out, wind must be at most 2.5m/s. Air moving over bedding all night removes heat you cannot replace by sitting up. | at most 2.5 m/s | reasoning/intents |
| For sleeping out, privacy must be at most 30 on the reporting scale. Sleeping is the least guarded thing anybody does outdoors. | at most 30 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For sleeping out, noise must be at most 45 on the reporting scale. Intermittent noise wakes people that steady noise does not, which is why a quiet average tells you nothing here. | at most 45 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For cooking outside, wind must be at most 3.5m/s. Wind is the whole argument here and it cuts both ways: still air parks smoke on the guests, and moving air throws heat, ash and flame sideways. Where the grill sits relative to the doors is a decision, not a detail. Clearance from the house, from anything overhead and from anything combustible is a code question for somebody who can see the site. | at most 3.5 m/s | reasoning/intents |
| For cooking outside, felt must be at most 24C. You are already standing next to a heat source. The air only has to be cooler than you are. | at most 24 C | reasoning/intents |
| For cooking outside, glare must be at most 30 on the reporting scale. You cannot judge a piece of meat you cannot see, and the west sun at six is exactly at eye height. | at most 30 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For cooking outside, directSun must be at most 70 on the reporting scale. Full sun on the cook is added on top of the fire, not instead of it. | at most 70 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For cooking outside, wetness must be at most 55 on the reporting scale. Somewhere to put a plate down that is not wet is most of what a cook wants from a surface. | at most 55 0-100 scale | reasoning/intents |
| For drying the washing, dryingTime must be at most 6h. This is the answer, and it is not the same question as whether it rained. Evaporation is run against the radiation and air that actually reach that spot, which is why a line in the lee of a north wall can still be wet at six on a dry day. A spot that keeps catching you out is one you stop trusting, whatever it does on a good afternoon. | at most 6 h | reasoning/intents |
| For drying the washing, sunHours must be at least 2.5h. Direct sun does the last of the drying and most of the smell. | at least 2.5 h | reasoning/intents |
| For drying the washing, uvDose must be at most 1.4 MJ/m2/day. The same ultraviolet that brightens white cotton takes the colour out of everything else. | at most 1.4 MJ/m2/day | reasoning/intents |
Sources
- NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Solar Calculation DetailsHuman reviewed
solar-position, declination, equation-of-time · reviewed 2026-09-05
Positional astronomy only. It says nothing about how much energy arrives through a real atmosphere.
- ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals, Climatic Design Information, clear-sky solar modelHuman reviewed
irradiance, beam, diffuse · reviewed 2026-09-05
Site-specific optical depths come from the ASHRAE station tables. Where a site has none, the product substitutes a seasonal approximation and says so.
- Applied Optics, Kasten and Young, Revised optical air mass tables and approximation formulaHuman reviewed
air-mass, irradiance · reviewed 2026-09-05
- Solar Energy, Erbs, Klein and Duffie, Estimation of the diffuse radiation fractionHuman reviewed
diffuse-fraction, cloud · reviewed 2026-09-05
- Solar Energy, Kasten and Czeplak, Solar and terrestrial radiation dependent on the amount and type of cloudHuman reviewed
cloud, global-radiation · reviewed 2026-09-05
- ISO 7726, Ergonomics of the thermal environment, instruments for measuring physical quantitiesHuman reviewed
mean-radiant-temperature · reviewed 2026-09-05
Defines how mean radiant temperature is measured. The product estimates it from modelled fluxes, which is a different and weaker thing.
- International Journal of Climatology, Thorsson and others, Different methods for estimating the mean radiant temperature in an outdoor urban settingHuman reviewed
mean-radiant-temperature, angular-factors · reviewed 2026-09-05
- ASHRAE Standard 55, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human OccupancyHuman reviewed
operative-temperature, comfort · reviewed 2026-09-05
Written for indoor occupancy. Outdoors people move, adapt and expect variation, so the comfort bands here are wider than the standard's.
- Oke; Steyn, Boundary Layer Climates and the sky view factor methodHuman reviewed
sky-view-factor, night-cooling · reviewed 2026-09-05
- Proceedings of the Royal Society A, Penman, Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grassHuman reviewed
evaporation, drying · reviewed 2026-09-05
Derived for open water and short grass. Fabric and foam expose far more surface to moving air, which the product applies as an explicit multiplier rather than pretending the equation covers it.
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Prata, A new long-wave formula for estimating downward clear-sky radiation at the surfaceHuman reviewed
longwave, night-cooling · reviewed 2026-09-05
- Agricultural Meteorology, Parton and Logan, A model for diurnal variation in soil and air temperatureHuman reviewed
diurnal-temperature · reviewed 2026-09-05
- US National Weather Service, Weather Prediction Center, The Heat Index EquationHuman reviewed
heat-index, humidity · reviewed 2026-09-05
- US National Weather Service, Wind Chill Temperature IndexHuman reviewed
wind-chill · reviewed 2026-09-05
- USDA Agricultural Research Service, Plant Hardiness Zone MapHuman reviewed
hardiness, plant-selection · reviewed 2026-09-05 · United States
Describes average annual extreme minimum temperature and nothing else. It cannot tell you whether a plant will get enough light, dry out, or cook against a wall.
- NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, US Climate Normals 1991-2020Human reviewed
climate, temperature, precipitation · reviewed 2026-09-05 · United States
- Open-Meteo, Historical Weather API, ERA5 reanalysisHuman reviewed
climate, wind, solar-radiation, precipitation · reviewed 2026-09-05
Reanalysis is modelled on a grid, not measured at an address. Near coasts, in valleys and inside cities the local reality can differ substantially.
- ECMWF Copernicus Climate Change Service, ERA5 global reanalysisHuman reviewed
climate, reanalysis · reviewed 2026-09-05
- US Environmental Protection Agency, Using Cool Pavements to Reduce Heat IslandsHuman reviewed
albedo, paving, surface-temperature · reviewed 2026-09-05
Reflective paving lowers surface and air temperature while raising the radiant load on a person standing on it. Both effects are real and the product reports them separately.
- USDA Forest Products Laboratory, Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering MaterialHuman reviewed
timber, moisture, weathering, decay · reviewed 2026-09-05
- American Wood Protection Association, Use Category System for treated woodHuman reviewed
treated-timber, ground-contact · reviewed 2026-09-05 · United States
- American Architectural Manufacturers Association, Voluntary specifications for high performance organic coatings on aluminiumHuman reviewed
powder-coating, uv-fading, aluminium · reviewed 2026-09-05
A coating class, not a product guarantee. Two powder-coated frames can differ by a decade of colour life.
- ASTM G154, Practice for operating fluorescent ultraviolet lamp apparatus for exposure of materialsHuman reviewed
uv-testing, fading · reviewed 2026-09-05
Accelerated weathering correlates with real exposure only loosely. Hours in a chamber are not years on a terrace.
- ISO 105-B04, Textiles, colour fastness to weatheringHuman reviewed
textile, uv-fading · reviewed 2026-09-05
- ASTM and DIN 51130 ramp test, Slip resistance classification for pedestrian surfacesHuman reviewed
slip, paving · reviewed 2026-09-05
Slip class is measured on a clean sample. Algae, frost and a low sun angle change the real answer more than the rating does.
- ASTM C666, Resistance of concrete to rapid freezing and thawingHuman reviewed
freeze-thaw, concrete, masonry · reviewed 2026-09-05
- ISO 9223, Corrosion of metals and alloys, corrosivity of atmospheresHuman reviewed
corrosion, coastal, steel · reviewed 2026-09-05
- DarkSky International, Five Principles for Responsible Outdoor LightingHuman reviewed
lighting, light-spill, shielding · reviewed 2026-09-05
- USDA National Agroforestry Center, Windbreak design and functionHuman reviewed
windbreak, shelter, porosity · reviewed 2026-09-05
Derived from field shelterbelts. A short screen between buildings sits in a far more complicated flow than an open field does.
- World Meteorological Organization, Guide to Instruments and Methods of Observation, wind measurement and exposureHuman reviewed
wind-profile, roughness · reviewed 2026-09-05
- Purdue University Horticulture, Faust and others, Daily light integral as a design metric for plant growthHuman reviewed
daily-light-integral, plant-light · reviewed 2026-09-05
Developed largely for controlled and greenhouse production. Outdoors it is still the best single number for light, but species tolerance varies widely.
- Royal Horticultural Society, Plant selection and site assessment guidanceHuman reviewed
plant-selection, aspect, soil · reviewed 2026-09-05 · United Kingdom
- ANSI A300 / Tree Care Industry Association, Tree care operations standardHuman reviewed
trees, pruning, clearance · reviewed 2026-09-05
- ASCE 7, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other StructuresHuman reviewed
wind-load, snow-load, structures · reviewed 2026-09-05 · United States
This is where the product stops. Anything that has to stand up in a storm is an engineer's calculation, not a design tool's estimate.
- Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Thermal comfort observations and apparent temperatureEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
apparent-temperature, humidity, heat-index · evidence checked 2026-09-08
CORRECT · BOM apparent-temperature guidance · Publisher guidance confirms temperature/humidity and outdoor wind/radiation distinctions; exact Exposure Atlas thresholds remain product decisions.
BOM distinguishes indoor/shade apparent temperature from outdoor forms that include wind and radiation. Exposure Atlas resolves radiation separately, so the source supports the variables and boundary, not the product's exact cross-fade thresholds.
- Solar Energy, Perez and others, Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradianceEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
diffuse-fraction, sky-distribution, irradiance · evidence checked 2026-09-08
PASS · DOI 10.1016/0038-092X(90)90055-H · Peer-reviewed Perez model verified; cited only as an anisotropic-sky reference and known alternative.
An anisotropic sky model. The product uses an isotropic diffuse assumption, so this is a known simplification rather than an implemented one.
- Solar Energy, Reindl, Beckman and Duffie, Diffuse fraction correlationsEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
diffuse-fraction, cloud · evidence checked 2026-09-08
PASS · DOI 10.1016/0038-092X(90)90060-P · Peer-reviewed diffuse-fraction correlation verified; Exposure Atlas still uses Erbs, so this remains comparative evidence.
An alternative to Erbs. Where the two disagree the product uses Erbs, and this entry exists so the disagreement is visible rather than hidden.
- International Commission on Illumination, ISO 15469:2004(E) / CIE S 011/E:2003 — Spatial distribution of daylight — CIE standard general skyEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
sky-distribution, diffuse-fraction, daylight · evidence checked 2026-09-08
CORRECT · ISO 15469:2004(E) / CIE S 011/E:2003 · Exact CIE publication identified and the limitation tightened to describe the model gap rather than imply implementation.
Defines standardized sky-luminance distributions. Exposure Atlas currently treats diffuse sky as isotropic, so this source documents a known simplification rather than an implemented CIE sky model.
- International Commission on Illumination, CIE 150:2017 — Guide on the Limitation of the Effects of Obtrusive Light from Outdoor Lighting Installations, 2nd EditionEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
lighting, glare, light-trespass · evidence checked 2026-09-08
CORRECT · CIE 150:2017, 2nd edition · Exact edition and publication page verified; scope is obtrusive-light guidance and recommended limits.
Provides recommended limits and design guidance for obtrusive effects of outdoor lighting. It is not a domestic comfort model and does not replace local lighting rules or a photometric design.
- Illuminating Engineering Society, ANSI/IES TM-15-20 — Luminaire Classification System for Outdoor LuminairesEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
lighting, glare, shielding · evidence checked 2026-09-08
CORRECT · ANSI/IES TM-15-20 · Exact IES technical memorandum verified; source class corrected to standard and BUG/LCS scope stated narrowly.
Defines luminaire distribution and BUG ratings. It classifies fixture output; it does not predict the lived glare or brightness of a particular residential scene.
- British Standards Institution / CEN, BS EN 12464-2:2024 — Light and lighting — Lighting of work places — Outdoor work placesEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
lighting, illuminance · evidence checked 2026-09-08 · European standard; UK adoption shown
CORRECT · BS EN 12464-2:2024 · Current UK adoption of EN 12464-2 verified; domestic-target language removed because the standard is scoped to outdoor workplaces.
Applies to visual comfort and performance at outdoor workplaces. It is not a residential-terrace target and does not itself specify the safety and health requirements of workers at work.
- International Organization for Standardization, ISO 7730:2025 — Ergonomics of the thermal environment — PMV, PPD and local thermal comfort criteriaEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
operative-temperature, thermal-comfort · evidence checked 2026-09-08
CORRECT · ISO 7730:2025, edition 4 · 2005 edition is withdrawn; 2025 edition is current. Outdoor product thresholds must not be represented as ISO PMV/PPD limits.
Applies to healthy people in moderate indoor environments where thermal comfort is desirable. Exposure Atlas uses it only as indoor-comfort context; its outdoor bands and apparent-temperature thresholds are product boundaries, not ISO 7730 limits.
- UTCI / International Society of Biometeorology, Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) — operational procedure and reference modelEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
apparent-temperature, thermal-comfort, mean-radiant-temperature · evidence checked 2026-09-08
CORRECT · UTCI operational procedure · UTCI variables and purpose verified; subjective 'most defensible' wording removed and non-implementation made explicit.
UTCI is a comprehensive outdoor thermal-stress index using air temperature, wind, humidity and radiation. Exposure Atlas does not implement UTCI and must not label its own thresholds as UTCI categories.
- ASTM International, ASTM G155-25 — Standard Practice for Operating Xenon Arc Lamp Apparatus for Exposure of MaterialsEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
uv-fading, uv-degradation, weathering · evidence checked 2026-09-08
CORRECT · ASTM G155-25 · Current active xenon-arc practice verified. It does not define the carrier's UV severity threshold.
Defines xenon-arc exposure apparatus and practice. It does not establish a universal outdoor-years conversion or Exposure Atlas's 1.1 MJ/m²/day UV severity boundary.
- ASTM International, ASTM D2565-23 — Standard Practice for Xenon-Arc Exposure of Plastics Intended for Outdoor ApplicationsEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
uv-degradation, weathering · evidence checked 2026-09-08
CORRECT · ASTM D2565-23 · Current active outdoor-plastics xenon-arc practice verified and limitations narrowed to its stated scope.
Induces daylight, moisture and heat related property changes in plastics. It does not simulate every localized weathering mechanism, including pollution, biological attack or saltwater exposure.
- International Organization for Standardization, ISO 4892-2:2013 + Amd 1:2021 — Plastics — Xenon-arc exposure methodsEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
uv-degradation, weathering · evidence checked 2026-09-08
CORRECT · ISO 4892-2:2013 + Amd 1:2021 · Published edition remains current; replacement is still under development as of the audit.
The 2013 edition with its 2021 amendment remains published and current as of this audit, while a replacement edition is under development. Laboratory exposure is not a universal conversion to outdoor service life.
- ASTM International, ASTM D1435-20 — Standard Practice for Outdoor Weathering of PlasticsEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
weathering, uv-degradation · evidence checked 2026-09-08
CORRECT · ASTM D1435-20 · Active outdoor-weathering practice verified. Existing UV-fraction and playground-heat bindings were rejected as citation mismatches.
Outdoor durability varies materially by exposure location, including UV, wetness, temperature and pollutants. Results from one location cannot be assumed to transfer to another; the standard does not define UV fraction or playground surface temperature.
- British Standards Institution / CEN, BS EN 350:2016 — Durability of wood and wood-based products — Testing and classification of durability to biological agentsEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
timber-durability, decay, weathering · evidence checked 2026-09-08 · European standard; UK adoption shown
CORRECT · BS EN 350:2016 · Current standard under review; title/scope corrected to biological durability of wood and wood-based materials.
Classifies biological durability of wood and wood-based materials. It is not a guarantee for every board or product and is not a substitute for testing biocide efficacy.
- British Standards Institution / CEN, BS EN 335:2013 — Durability of wood and wood-based products — Use classesEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
timber-durability, decay · evidence checked 2026-09-08 · European standard; UK adoption shown
CORRECT · BS EN 335:2013 · Use-class scope verified; the source contextualizes wetting exposure but does not define a four-month product threshold.
Defines service-condition use classes and associated biological-agent exposure. It does not establish Exposure Atlas's four-month wetting-cycle threshold.
- ASTM International, ASTM A123/A123M-24 — Zinc (Hot-Dip Galvanized) Coatings on Iron and Steel ProductsEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
corrosion, coatings · evidence checked 2026-09-08
CORRECT · ASTM A123/A123M-24 · Current coating specification verified; unsupported service-life multiplier removed.
Specifies requirements for hot-dip zinc coatings on iron and steel products. It does not by itself predict service life, which depends on coating and environment.
- International Organization for Standardization, ISO 12944-2:2017 — Corrosion protection of steel structures by protective paint systems — Part 2: Classification of environmentsEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
corrosion, coatings · evidence checked 2026-09-08
CORRECT · ISO 12944-2:2017 · Part 2 is the relevant environment-classification source; published 2017 edition remains current while revision is underway.
Classifies principal environments and corrosivity as one input to protective-paint selection. The published 2017 edition remains current while a replacement is under development; it should not be treated as numerically identical to ISO 9223 at every site.
- UK Slip Resistance Group, UKSRG Guidelines — The Assessment of Floor Slip Resistance, Issue 5Evidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
slip, surface · evidence checked 2026-09-08 · United Kingdom
CORRECT · UKSRG Guidelines Issue 5 · Guidance explicitly includes method and as-found assessment; prior wording that implied only wet-clean testing was corrected.
Pendulum-test results depend on test method, slider, direction and surface condition; UKSRG guidance includes as-found assessment. A clean laboratory value is not a guarantee for a wet, contaminated garden route.
- International Code Council, ICC A117.1-2017 — Standard for Accessible and Usable Buildings and FacilitiesEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
slip, surface, accessibility · evidence checked 2026-09-08 · United States
CORRECT · ICC A117.1-2017 · Published accessibility standard verified; legal adoption and product-specific slip testing remain outside the carrier.
Provides accessibility technical criteria for sites, facilities, buildings and elements. It is not a product-specific slip-test method and local code adoption still controls legal applicability.
- International Organization for Standardization, ISO 13370:2017 — Thermal performance of buildings — Heat transfer via the ground — Calculation methodsEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
thermal-mass, surface, ground-temperature · evidence checked 2026-09-08
CORRECT · ISO 13370:2017, edition 3 · Current standard verified; scope tightened to building elements in thermal contact with ground.
Calculates heat transfer for building elements in thermal contact with the ground. It does not validate a transient exposed-patio surface-temperature model and is only contextual where ground coupling matters.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56 — Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirementsEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
evaporation, drying, irrigation · evidence checked 2026-09-08
PASS · FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56 (1998) · Canonical FAO publication verified; product drying thresholds are explicitly separated from FAO reference-ET methodology.
FAO-56 reference evapotranspiration is defined around a standardized reference crop and meteorological inputs. Exposure Atlas uses the physical relationships as context; its patio/cushion drying-hour thresholds are product classifications, not FAO limits.
- USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Handbook — drainage classes and hydrologic soil informationEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
drainage, soil · evidence checked 2026-09-08 · United States
PASS · USDA NRCS National Soil Survey Handbook · Current NRCS handbook and drainage-class context verified; property-scale limitation retained.
Soil-survey information is landscape-scale reference data. It cannot establish the drainage, compaction or fill condition of one property, which must be observed or measured locally.
- Royal Horticultural Society, RHS — Waterlogging and floodingEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
drainage, soil, planting · evidence checked 2026-09-08 · United Kingdom
CORRECT · RHS Waterlogging and flooding guidance · Exact practical guidance page verified and boundary against civil drainage design made explicit.
Practical horticultural guidance for waterlogged garden soils. It is not civil-drainage design and does not replace site-specific infiltration, grading or drainage assessment.
- Royal Horticultural Society, RHS — Choosing plants for seasonally wet and dry soilsEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
planting, wet-dry-site · evidence checked 2026-09-08 · United Kingdom
CORRECT · RHS Plants for Places — wet/dry soils · Broad generic plant URL replaced with the exact site-condition guidance actually cited.
Plant lists are horticultural examples in a temperate UK context. Site climate, cultivar, soil, establishment and local invasiveness can change suitability materially.
- Missouri Botanical Garden, Missouri Botanical Garden Plant Finder — culture, light and moisture profilesEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
planting, hardiness, shade-tolerance · evidence checked 2026-09-08 · United States
PASS · Missouri Botanical Garden Plant Finder · Plant profiles expose culture/light/moisture information; limitation clarifies these are reference examples, not local prescriptions.
Species and cultivar profiles provide culture and site-fit reference information. They are examples rather than a substitute for local nursery, extension or invasive-species guidance.
- International Society of Arboriculture, ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualification (TRAQ)Evidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
tree-work, professional-boundary · evidence checked 2026-09-08
CORRECT · ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualification · Exact TRAQ credential page verifies the professional tree-risk-assessment boundary.
Cited to mark a professional boundary. Exposure Atlas does not inspect tree condition, assign tree-risk ratings or state that a tree is safe to retain, prune or work around.
- Atmospheric Research, de Miguel et al., Sensitivity analysis of ratio between ultraviolet and total shortwave solar radiation to cloudiness, ozone, aerosols and precipitable waterEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
uv-ratio, cloud, solar-radiation · evidence checked 2026-09-08
PASS · Atmospheric Research 102 (2011) 136-144; DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.06.019 · Peer-reviewed study directly addresses atmospheric sensitivity of UV/shortwave ratios.
Shows that UV-to-shortwave ratio changes with atmospheric state; it does not provide a universal 4.5% clear-sky value or a universal cloud adjustment.
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Grant and Gao, Diffuse fraction of UV radiation under partly cloudy skies as defined by the Automated Surface Observation System (ASOS)Evidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
uv-ratio, cloud, diffuse-fraction · evidence checked 2026-09-08
PASS · JGR Atmospheres; DOI 10.1029/2002JD002201 · Peer-reviewed study directly addresses diffuse UV under partly cloudy skies.
Partly-cloudy UV behavior is non-linear and geometry-dependent. It supports treating cloud effects as uncertain rather than as a universal fixed coefficient.
- Building and Environment, Pfautsch, Wujeska-Klause and Walters, Outdoor playgrounds and climate change: Importance of surface materials and shade to extend play time and prevent burn injuriesEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
surface-temperature, playground, rubber, shade, burn-risk · evidence checked 2026-09-08
PASS · Building and Environment 223 (2022) 109500; DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109500 · Open-access field study directly measures playground material temperatures and shade effects.
Sydney measurements show material/color/shade effects and high contact temperatures; they are not a universal temperature prediction for every product, climate or installation.
- ASTM International, ASTM C1186-26 — Standard Specification for Flat Fiber-Cement SheetsEvidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
fiber-cement, exterior-cladding, weather-exposure · evidence checked 2026-09-08
PASS · ASTM C1186-26 publisher scope and abstract · Current active 2026 specification directly covers flat fiber-cement sheets intended for exterior claddings, facades, curtain walls and soffits.
Covers flat fiber-cement sheets for exterior applications and distinguishes exposure types. Product-specific sealing, installation, freeze-thaw performance and warranty still have to come from the actual manufacturer/specification.
- U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Uncoated Weathering Steel in Structures — Technical Advisory T 5140.22Evidence verifiedHuman signoff pending
weathering-steel, corrosion, wet-dry-cycle, chloride · evidence checked 2026-09-08 · United States
PASS · FHWA uncoated-weathering-steel environmental suitability guidance · FHWA guidance directly identifies time of wetness, persistent moisture and coastal/salt exposure as governing conditions for weathering-steel performance.
Bridge guidance demonstrates the importance of drying time, chlorides and corrosive exposure for uncoated weathering steel. It is not a residential product specification or a structural design standard.
What leaves this device
A place you map, its photographs, your observations and every change you try are stored on this device and nowhere else. They are never uploaded.
Three things do travel, and it is fairer to list them than to promise nothing does. Searching for a town sends what you typed to Open-Meteo, and the weather for a place is asked for with its coordinates rounded to about a kilometre. The reference library is read by this site's own server, so no database is contacted from your browser. And page visits are counted with Vercel Web Analytics on this same site: no cookies, and a saved place's address in this site, any search terms and anything after a # are removed before the count is sent.
Where this stops
Structure, footings, wind and snow loading, drainage, electrical work, planning consent and boundary law are all outside this. When a change touches one of them the product names it rather than guessing, because the failure mode of guessing there is somebody's pergola in somebody's window.
Naming a boundary and stopping there is half a sentence, though. Every document ends with the other half: who to ask, the questions this property's own geometry raises, what to have in your hand when you go, and where the register is published so a name can be checked. It routes; it never says what the answer will be.
Map a place