The July fix that February will hate

A decision record somebody can price without pretending it is a construction drawing.

The tested change, the geometry it depends on, the annual consequence, what must be verified before ordering, what success looks like, and the questions the bid still has to answer.

Month 9

17:00

Decision record · revision 1

Face the seating south

Record demo-adversarial-winter-sun-trap:1:rotate-seat:9:17

weak across seasons

Turn the chairs to look south, which puts the low sun behind the shoulder instead of across the table.

Baseline

86

Dinner outside · Dinner table

Forecast

87

+1 points

Annual average

+10

worst season +0

Survey standing: Quick: The sun can be placed. Angles, sunrise and sunset, and the shape of the day are right, and everything that depends on what stands in the way is a guess.

Design intent dimensions

Bearing180°

Four-season acceptance basis

SeasonBeforeAfterDeltaControlling after
January4242+0What it feels like
April100100+0none
July4242+0What it feels like
October60100+40none

The same built change does not produce a dependable improvement across the year.

Site controls this price depends on

ControlValueProvenanceBefore ordering
South-facing house18 ft highmeasuredrecorded
Dinner tablePoint at 3.8 ft above ground; facing 230°measuredrecorded

Verification queue

  1. Who can actually see in. Sit where you actually sit and look around. Mark the one window or path you can see a person from. Until one exists, privacy is a question we are not answering rather than one that is fine.
    This is not a refinement. Nothing can answer this question until somebody marks it. · sit-there
  2. What the paving actually is. Photograph the paving next to something white. How dark it is decides both how hot it gets underfoot and how much light it throws back up at a seated person.
    The overall verdict does not move, but wetness changes by 25 points, so it matters for that question specifically. · photograph

Acceptance checks

  • Re-run the reading for dinner outside at Dinner table after installation and confirm the controlling failure is not worse than the tested proposal.
  • Check the completed geometry against the decision record before accepting substitutions: bearing 180°.
  • Confirm the installed intervention preserves the tested annual behaviour (weak).
  • Photograph the completed work from the original reading point and record any change to view, glare, privacy line or usable hours that the model did not predict.

Questions every bid should answer

  1. Still unanswered: privacy exposure, noise.?
  2. What exact product, fixing/anchoring method and maintenance regime is included in the price?
  3. Which dimensions or assumptions in this record would your proposal change, and why?
  4. What is excluded from the price: structural design, footing design, drainage, electrical work, planning/permit work, boundary verification or underground-service locating?

Explicit exclusions and professional boundaries

This decision record is design intent and decision evidence, not a construction drawing, structural calculation, permit set, boundary survey or setting-out document.
This record does not determine wind or snow loading, foundation or footing geometry, attachment adequacy, drainage works, electrical compliance, buried-service clearance, property lines or required approvals. Those questions remain with qualified people who can inspect the site and selected product.