The carport we are trying to eat in

A decision record somebody can price without pretending it is a construction drawing.

The modelled change, whether it has been tried at the place, the geometry it depends on, the annual consequence, what must be verified before ordering, what success looks like, and the questions the bid still has to answer.

October 30th, today's date

5:00 PM

Decision record · revision 1

A second seat 19 ft 8 in south-east

Record demo-carport-conversion:1:second-seat:2026:10:30:17. Read on 30th October 2026.

weak across seasons

Put two chairs 19 feet 8 inches to the south-east and leave the main table where it is. The point is not to fix this spot but to stop needing it at the hour it does not work.

Baseline

Unanswered

Dinner outside · The table under the roof

Forecast

Unanswered

No extra hours this day

Across the year

weak

The status does not move in any sampled season.

Survey standing: Mapped: Shade, sky view and daily light are computed from the geometry on this plan. Unmeasured dimensions remain estimates, not verified measurements.

Real-world trial: none yet. Everything above is a forecast from the plan.

Buy nothing yetTry a reversible version at the place and recheck it before this goes out to price.

Design intent dimensions

Distance from reading point19 ft 8 in
Bearing147°

Four-season acceptance basis

SeasonBeforeAfterHoursControlling after
JanuaryUnansweredUnansweredHours not claimednone
AprilUnansweredUnansweredHours not claimedWhat it feels like
JulyUnansweredUnansweredHours not claimedWhat it feels like
OctoberUnansweredUnansweredHours not claimedWhat it feels like

The status does not move in any sampled season.

Site controls this price depends on

ControlValueProvenanceBefore ordering
The house19 ft 8 in highYou said so: You told us this, and it beats what the model worked out.recorded
Carport roof9 ft 2 in high; underside 8 ft 2 inMeasured: Taken with a tape, a compass or a clock at the place.recorded
Corner post8 ft 2 in highYou said so: You told us this, and it beats what the model worked out.recorded
Corner post8 ft 2 in highYou said so: You told us this, and it beats what the model worked out.recorded
The table under the roofPoint at 3 ft 11 in above ground; facing 180°You said so: You told us this, and it beats what the model worked out.recorded

Verification queue

  1. Who can actually see in. Sit where you actually sit and look around. Mark the one window or path you can see a person from. Until one exists, privacy is a question we are not answering rather than one that is fine.
    This is not a refinement. Nothing can answer this question until somebody marks it. · sit-there
  2. What you are looking at. Mark the direction of the view worth keeping. No view has been marked yet, so nothing weighs what the view is worth, and a screen that blocks it looks free.
    This is not a refinement. Nothing can answer this question until somebody marks it. · sit-there

Acceptance checks

  • Re-run the reading for dinner outside at The table under the roof after installation and confirm the controlling failure is not worse than the forecast for this proposal.
  • Check the completed geometry against the decision record before accepting substitutions: distance from reading point 19 ft 8 in, bearing 147°.
  • Confirm the installed intervention keeps the forecast annual behaviour (weak).
  • Photograph the completed work from the original reading point and record any change to view, glare, privacy line or usable hours that the model did not predict.

Questions every bid should answer

  1. How will you verify: Somewhere else on the property that behaves differently?
  2. Mark 19 feet 8 inches out on the ground and stand there before committing. The geometry is only as good as that distance.
  3. Still unanswered: privacy exposure, view, noise.
  4. What exact product, fixing/anchoring method and maintenance regime is included in the price?
  5. Which dimensions or assumptions in this record would your proposal change, and why?
  6. What is excluded from the price: structural design, footing design, drainage, electrical work, planning/permit work, boundary verification or underground-service locating?

Explicit exclusions and professional boundaries

CheckOnly worth it if the second spot genuinely behaves differently. The comparison below says whether it does.
CheckThis decision record is design intent and decision evidence, not a construction drawing, structural calculation, permit set, boundary survey or setting-out document.
CheckThis record does not determine wind or snow loading, foundation or footing geometry, attachment adequacy, drainage works, electrical compliance, buried-service clearance, property lines or required approvals. Those questions remain with qualified people who can inspect the site and selected product.