The front porch nobody sits on

A decision record somebody can price without pretending it is a construction drawing.

The tested change, the geometry it depends on, the annual consequence, what must be verified before ordering, what success looks like, and the questions the bid still has to answer.

Month 9

17:00

Decision record · revision 1

A 7.1 ft screen 6.3 ft from the seat

Record demo-front-porch-street:1:privacy-screen:9:17

seasonal across seasons

A screen 7.1 feet high and about 8.6 feet wide, standing 6.3 feet from the seat on the line to The house opposite and People on the sidewalk.

Baseline

44

Read for an hour · The porch chair

Forecast

100

+56 points

Annual average

+35

worst season +0

Survey standing: Mapped: Shade, sky view and daily light are computed from real geometry rather than assumed. This is the rung at which the product starts telling you things you did not already know.

Design intent dimensions

Height7.1 ft
Width8.6 ft
Distance from reading point6.3 ft
Bearing184°

Four-season acceptance basis

SeasonBeforeAfterDeltaControlling after
January4242+0What it feels like
April3873+35What it feels like
July4395+52What it feels like
October4294+52What it feels like

It earns its keep in 3 seasons and is roughly neutral in the rest.

Site controls this price depends on

ControlValueProvenanceBefore ordering
The house25 ft highdeclaredrecorded
Porch roof10.5 ft high; underside 9.5 ftmeasuredrecorded
Porch rail3.1 ft highmeasuredrecorded
Street tree26 ft high; underside 7.9 ftdeclaredVERIFY
The porch chairPoint at 3.6 ft above a floor 2.3 ft above datum; facing 180°declaredrecorded
People on the sidewalk25 ft from the reading point; eye 5.2 ft above datumdeclaredrecorded
The house opposite59 ft from the reading point; eye 13.8 ft above datuminferredVERIFY

Verification queue

    Acceptance checks

    • Re-run the reading for reading for an hour at The porch chair after installation and confirm the controlling failure is not worse than the tested proposal.
    • Check the completed geometry against the decision record before accepting substitutions: height 7.1 ft, width 8.6 ft, distance from reading point 6.3 ft, bearing 184°.
    • Confirm the installed intervention preserves the tested annual behaviour (seasonal).
    • Photograph the completed work from the original reading point and record any change to view, glare, privacy line or usable hours that the model did not predict.

    Questions every bid should answer

    1. How will you verify: A confirmed observer?
    2. How will you verify: Somewhere on your own land to stand it?
    3. Measure the actual height available before ordering: this is sized at 2.2 metres and a hundred millimetres either way changes whether it works.?
    4. Mark 1.9 metres out on the ground and stand there before committing. The geometry is only as good as that distance.?
    5. Still unanswered: noise.?
    6. What exact product, fixing/anchoring method and maintenance regime is included in the price?
    7. Which dimensions or assumptions in this record would your proposal change, and why?
    8. What is excluded from the price: structural design, footing design, drainage, electrical work, planning/permit work, boundary verification or underground-service locating?

    Explicit exclusions and professional boundaries

    Anything freestanding above about 1.8 metres is a wind-loaded structure and may need consent as well as footings.
    Sized against The house opposite and People on the sidewalk together; the height comes from whichever of them sits highest.
    This decision record is design intent and decision evidence, not a construction drawing, structural calculation, permit set, boundary survey or setting-out document.
    This record does not determine wind or snow loading, foundation or footing geometry, attachment adequacy, drainage works, electrical compliance, buried-service clearance, property lines or required approvals. Those questions remain with qualified people who can inspect the site and selected product.