Denver (demonstration)

The patio the neighbour's window sets on fire

DemonstrationEdit the plan

When the table is open for dinner outside

Each month read on its 15th · 2026
Dinner outside, through the year. The table cannot be read for dinner outside in any month yet. 0 months open, 0 shut, 12 unanswered.JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0months open
  • Works
  • Tight
  • No
  • Unanswered

Rings run from 3 pm at the centre to 11 pm at the edge.

The table cannot be read for dinner outside in any month yet.

  • All year: cannot be answered, because privacy exposure has not been recorded here.
The same year as a table
MonthOpenUsable hoursWhat decides it
JanuaryPrivacy exposure closes it
FebruaryPrivacy exposure closes it
MarchPrivacy exposure closes it
AprilPrivacy exposure closes it
MayPrivacy exposure closes it
JunePrivacy exposure closes it
JulyPrivacy exposure closes it
AugustPrivacy exposure closes it
SeptemberPrivacy exposure closes it
OctoberPrivacy exposure closes it
NovemberPrivacy exposure closes it
DecemberPrivacy exposure closes it
The evening skyThe house20.3 ftNeighbour's extension14.4 ftBoundary hedge6.2 ftThe tableN16 ft
BuildingNot yoursCanopyShadow nowCan see inProposed

Reading at

7:35 PM·September
September 14 · The table

The evidence behind this whole day is thin, so nothing on the strip is marked out as worse than the rest. The shape of the day is still the model’s best reading; the confidence in it is low, and it stays low until something it needs is measured.

The table cannot be answered for dinner outside yet.

Nothing in September clears what dinner outside needs here.

The same day as a table
The same day hour by hour, in text.
HourSunVerdictConfidenceSun position
12:00 AMdarkUnanswereda starting hypothesis
3:00 AMdarkUnanswereda starting hypothesis
6:00 AMdarkUnanswereda starting hypothesis
7:00 AMin sunUnanswereda starting hypothesis3° up, bearing 88°
8:00 AMin sunUnanswereda starting hypothesis15° up, bearing 98°
9:00 AMin sunUnanswereda starting hypothesis26° up, bearing 109°
10:00 AMin sunUnanswereda starting hypothesis36° up, bearing 121°
11:00 AMin sunUnanswereda starting hypothesis45° up, bearing 137°
12:00 PMin sunUnanswereda starting hypothesis51° up, bearing 157°
1:00 PMin sunUnanswereda starting hypothesis53° up, bearing 182°
2:00 PMin sunUnanswereda starting hypothesis51° up, bearing 206°
3:00 PMin sunUnanswereda starting hypothesis44° up, bearing 226°
4:00 PMin sunUnanswereda starting hypothesis35° up, bearing 241°
5:00 PMshaded by Neighbour's extensionUnanswereda starting hypothesis24° up, bearing 253°
6:00 PMshaded by Neighbour's extensionUnanswereda starting hypothesis13° up, bearing 263°
7:00 PMshaded by Neighbour's extensionUnanswereda starting hypothesis1° up, bearing 273°
9:00 PMdarkUnanswereda starting hypothesis

Sit down, eat, and still want to be there ninety minutes later.

Dinner outside

We cannot say yet whether The table works for dinner outside, because privacy exposure is still unanswered.

  • View is18 short22 / 100 against at least 40

    Half the point of eating out here is what you are looking at.

Still unanswered:Privacy exposureNoise

Confidence low (38%). Treat this as a starting hypothesis, not an answer.

What this answer was built from
  • Use
    Dinner outside
  • Place
    The table
  • Weather
    High desert, cold winters, intense sun (scenario shape), scenario (from a published source)
  • Method
    Traced geometry and radiation at this hour, measured against what this use needs
  • How well this place is described

    Mapped
    1. Quick
    2. Mapped
    3. Annotated
    4. Measured

    Shade, sky view and daily light are computed from real geometry rather than assumed. This is the rung at which the product starts telling you things you did not already know.

    It cannot answer who can see in, and it cannot tell you whether the heights it is using are the real ones.

    To reach Annotated

    • Photographs of the actual place: None annotated. A photograph is how a drawn height gets checked against a real one.
    • Photographs that know where they were taken from: No photograph has a position and a bearing, so what is marked on them cannot become a measurement.
    • Who can see in: Nobody marked. Privacy is a question about who sees in from where, and the product will not invent one.

    What that buys: The privacy question, and a check on the geometry. Most inferred heights are wrong by enough to matter, and a photograph settles it in a minute.

    Everything that was checked
    • Quick A place on the earth: Denver (demonstration), with a time zone, which is what makes an hour an hour.
    • Quick Somewhere to read: 1 spot marked. A reading is a height at a place, and moving it moves the answer.
    • Mapped The things in the way: 3 objects drawn. The house counts, and so does the neighbour's.
    • Mapped What is underfoot: 1 of 1 readings sit on a mapped surface.
    • Mapped Where the property ends: Drawn, so the product can tell you when the cheapest fix stands on someone else's land.
    • Annotated Photographs of the actual place: None annotated. A photograph is how a drawn height gets checked against a real one.
    • Annotated Photographs that know where they were taken from: No photograph has a position and a bearing, so what is marked on them cannot become a measurement.
    • Annotated Who can see in: Nobody marked. Privacy is a question about who sees in from where, and the product will not invent one.
    • Measured Heights off a tape: 0 of 3 objects are measured. The remaining 3 are this product's own inference, so no figure here is a survey figure yet.
    • Measured Something checked against the day: Nothing has been checked against a real afternoon. The model is unopposed, which is not the same as being right.

    What to measure next

    Ranked by how far the answer moves, not by a checklist
    1. 1Who can actually see inSit in the chair

      Sit where you actually sit and look around. Mark the one window or path you can see a person from. Until one exists, privacy is a question we are not answering rather than one that is fine.

      This is not a refinement. Nothing can answer this question until somebody marks it.

      Currently assuming: nobody is overlooking this. Tested across one confirmed observer changes the whole privacy answer.

    2. 2Neighbour's extension heightTape measureDirect sun ±100

      Measure how tall neighbour's extension actually is. A pole and a phone photo is enough.

      The verdict holds either way, but the margin moves by 21 points, which is the difference between comfortable and only just.

      9.4 ft → unknown 83 · 14.4 ft → unknown 62 · 19.5 ft → unknown 64

      Currently assuming: 14.4 ft, entered without measuring. Tested across 9.4 ft to 19.5 ft.

    What the place is doing at 7:35pm in September

    High desert, cold winters, intense sun (scenario shape).

    What it feels like

    comfortable

    62°F

    Felt temperature · 32 on the reporting scale

    It feels about 6 degrees cooler than the air, near 62°F.

    What is doing it

    • Air movement

      +2.7°
    • How much sky is overhead

      1.5°
    How this was worked out
  • Air
    67.5°F from High desert, cold winters, intense sun (scenario shape), scenario (from a published source)
  • Radiant
    47.6°F mean radiant temperature
  • Method
    Six-directional radiation integration, then ASHRAE operative temperature (from a published source)
  • Direct sun

    after dark

    0 W/m²

    Beam reaching this point · 0 on the reporting scale

    The sun is down.

    How this was worked out
  • Sun
    below the horizon
  • Traced
    0% of the beam reaches this point
  • Glare

    none

    0

    out of 100

    Nothing bright is in the line of sight at this hour.

    How this was worked out
  • Facing
    270deg
  • Privacy exposure

    Unanswered

    No observer has been placed yet. Privacy is a question about who can see in from where, and until one is marked there is nothing to answer.

    Wind

    light

    2.3 mph

    Wind at the seat · 11 on the reporting scale

    Wind here is light.

    How this was worked out
  • Reference
    6.6 mph at 10 m from High desert, cold winters, intense sun (scenario shape), scenario (from a published source)
  • At seat height
    2.3 mph before shelter
  • Shelter
    0% removed by what stands upwind
  • View

    mostly lost

    22

    out of 100

    About 78% of the view worth keeping is already gone from this seat.

    What is doing it

    • The evening sky

      +22
    How this was worked out
  • Corridors
    The evening sky
  • Method
    Rays sampled across each corridor's angular window
  • Surface heat

    comfortable

    67.5°F

    Surface temperature · 9 on the reporting scale

    The surface is running about 68°F.

    How this was worked out
  • Surface
    Poured concrete patio
  • Method
    Absorbed shortwave against air temperature, flattened by air movement (from a published source)
  • Wetness

    dries-fast

    1 x

    Drying time against the open · 7 on the reporting scale

    Sun and air movement here are enough to dry the surface at an ordinary rate.

    How this was worked out
  • Drying rate
    0.000 in/hour here
  • Method
    Penman combination equation on the radiation and air actually reaching this spot (from a published source)
  • Light after dark

    Unanswered

    No exterior or window light has been placed yet, so what changes after dark is unanswered.

    Ask something else about this place

    Everything on the plan, in text
    ThingReadingNote
    The house20.3 ft100 per cent solid.
    Neighbour's extension14.4 ft100 per cent solid.
    Boundary hedge6.2 ft70 per cent solid, and seasonal.