The balcony nobody uses

A decision record somebody can price without pretending it is a construction drawing.

The tested change, the geometry it depends on, the annual consequence, what must be verified before ordering, what success looks like, and the questions the bid still has to answer.

Month 9

17:00

Decision record · revision 1

A second seat 19.7 ft south

Record demo-windy-balcony:1:second-seat:9:17

tradeoff across seasons

Put two chairs 19.7 feet to the south and leave the main table where it is. The point is not to fix this spot but to stop needing it at the hour it does not work.

Baseline

39

Morning coffee · The one chair

Forecast

40

+1 points

Annual average

+6

worst season -5

Survey standing: Mapped: Shade, sky view and daily light are computed from real geometry rather than assumed. This is the rung at which the product starts telling you things you did not already know.

Design intent dimensions

Distance from reading point19.7 ft
Bearing162°

Four-season acceptance basis

SeasonBeforeAfterDeltaControlling after
January6991+22Privacy exposure
April3838+0Privacy exposure
July4237-5Privacy exposure
October4449+5Privacy exposure

This is a real seasonal trade: it helps in 2 seasons and hurts in 1.

Site controls this price depends on

ControlValueProvenanceBefore ordering
The building85 ft highdeclaredrecorded
Glass balustrade63 ft high; underside 59 ftdeclaredrecorded
The tower opposite112 ft highdeclaredVERIFY
The one chairPoint at 3.8 ft above a floor 59 ft above datum; facing 200°declaredrecorded
The flat opposite75 ft from the reading point; eye 57 ft above datuminferredVERIFY

Verification queue

  1. The tower opposite height. Measure how tall the tower opposite actually is. A pole and a phone photo is enough.
    The overall verdict does not move, but direct sun changes by 100 points, so it matters for that question specifically. · measure

Acceptance checks

  • Re-run the reading for morning coffee at The one chair after installation and confirm the controlling failure is not worse than the tested proposal.
  • Check the completed geometry against the decision record before accepting substitutions: distance from reading point 19.7 ft, bearing 162°.
  • Do not sign off the intervention from the installation-season result alone; this proposal has a known seasonal tradeoff in the annual comparison.
  • Photograph the completed work from the original reading point and record any change to view, glare, privacy line or usable hours that the model did not predict.

Questions every bid should answer

  1. How will you verify: Somewhere else on the property that behaves differently?
  2. Mark 6 metres out on the ground and stand there before committing. The geometry is only as good as that distance.?
  3. What exact product, fixing/anchoring method and maintenance regime is included in the price?
  4. Which dimensions or assumptions in this record would your proposal change, and why?
  5. What is excluded from the price: structural design, footing design, drainage, electrical work, planning/permit work, boundary verification or underground-service locating?

Explicit exclusions and professional boundaries

Only worth it if the second spot genuinely behaves differently. The comparison below says whether it does.
This decision record is design intent and decision evidence, not a construction drawing, structural calculation, permit set, boundary survey or setting-out document.
This record does not determine wind or snow loading, foundation or footing geometry, attachment adequacy, drainage works, electrical compliance, buried-service clearance, property lines or required approvals. Those questions remain with qualified people who can inspect the site and selected product.