The west patio that cooks at five

A decision record somebody can price without pretending it is a construction drawing.

The tested change, the geometry it depends on, the annual consequence, what must be verified before ordering, what success looks like, and the questions the bid still has to answer.

Month 9

17:00

Decision record · revision 1

A 7.1 ft screen 10.7 ft from the seat

Record demo-west-patio:1:privacy-screen:9:17

seasonal across seasons

A screen 7.1 feet high and about 8.1 feet wide, standing 10.7 feet from the seat on the line to Neighbour's upstairs window.

Baseline

45

Dinner outside · The dining table

Forecast

99

+54 points

Annual average

+20

worst season +0

Survey standing: Mapped: Shade, sky view and daily light are computed from real geometry rather than assumed. This is the rung at which the product starts telling you things you did not already know.

Design intent dimensions

Height7.1 ft
Width8.1 ft
Distance from reading point10.7 ft
Bearing162°

Four-season acceptance basis

SeasonBeforeAfterDeltaControlling after
January4444+0What it feels like
April45100+55Glare
July3444+10What it feels like
October3447+13Glare

It earns its keep in 3 seasons and is roughly neutral in the rest.

Site controls this price depends on

ControlValueProvenanceBefore ordering
The house21 ft highdeclaredrecorded
West fence5.9 ft highmeasuredrecorded
Neighbour's house24 ft highdeclaredrecorded
The maple28 ft high; underside 8.5 ftdeclaredVERIFY
The dining tablePoint at 3.9 ft above ground; facing 250°declaredrecorded
The herb planterPoint at 3 ft above grounddeclaredrecorded
Neighbour's upstairs window43 ft from the reading point; eye 15.1 ft above datumdeclaredrecorded

Verification queue

  1. The maple height. Measure how tall the maple actually is. A pole and a phone photo is enough.
    The overall verdict does not move, but direct sun changes by 86 points, so it matters for that question specifically. · measure

Acceptance checks

  • Re-run the reading for dinner outside at The dining table after installation and confirm the controlling failure is not worse than the tested proposal.
  • Check the completed geometry against the decision record before accepting substitutions: height 7.1 ft, width 8.1 ft, distance from reading point 10.7 ft, bearing 162°.
  • Confirm the installed intervention preserves the tested annual behaviour (seasonal).
  • Photograph the completed work from the original reading point and record any change to view, glare, privacy line or usable hours that the model did not predict.

Questions every bid should answer

  1. How will you verify: A confirmed observer?
  2. How will you verify: Somewhere on your own land to stand it?
  3. Measure the actual height available before ordering: this is sized at 2.2 metres and a hundred millimetres either way changes whether it works.?
  4. Mark 3.3 metres out on the ground and stand there before committing. The geometry is only as good as that distance.?
  5. Still unanswered: noise.?
  6. What exact product, fixing/anchoring method and maintenance regime is included in the price?
  7. Which dimensions or assumptions in this record would your proposal change, and why?
  8. What is excluded from the price: structural design, footing design, drainage, electrical work, planning/permit work, boundary verification or underground-service locating?

Explicit exclusions and professional boundaries

Anything freestanding above about 1.8 metres is a wind-loaded structure and may need consent as well as footings.
This decision record is design intent and decision evidence, not a construction drawing, structural calculation, permit set, boundary survey or setting-out document.
This record does not determine wind or snow loading, foundation or footing geometry, attachment adequacy, drainage works, electrical compliance, buried-service clearance, property lines or required approvals. Those questions remain with qualified people who can inspect the site and selected product.